Rethinking leviticus and rereading purity and danger. Her other essays exploring the implicit meanings of cultural symbols follow a similar durkheimian format. She follows emile durkheim in defining dirt as that which is out of its place ketchup in fine in the bottle or on the plate, but not on my shirt. Marking the 50th anniversary of douglas s classic, the present volume sheds fresh light upon themes raised by douglas by drawing on recent developments in the social sciences and humanities, as well as current empirical research. In 1991 the times literary supplement listed it as one of the hundred most influential nonfiction books published since 1945. Apr 23, 2017 an analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. This book has been hugely influential in many areas of debate. Since mary douglas published purity and danger in 1966. The claim of this symposium is that purity, contamination, and danger are motifs embroidered into public administration and.
Purity theories in religious studies and douglas s influence on the field m. It is widely cited in nonanthropological works and gave rise to a body of application, rebuttal and development within anthropology. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo, she delves in great detail into existing arguments that portray traditional societies as evolving from savage beliefs in magic, to religion, to modern science, then explains why she believes those arguments are wrong. Introduction since mary douglas published purity and danger in 1966. Ritual theory in purity and danger and its theoretical background n. A survey of this theory in architecture in the latetwentieth century reveals how it focused attention on relationships between dirt, cleanliness, and the design and organisation of spacean area previously neglected in architectural thought. Originally published in 1966, purity and danger, by mary douglas, is a treatise on the concepts of purity and uncleanness in various societies and cultures. This is a theoretical work, written less for a lay audience than for douglass fellow cultural anthropologists, and yet her style is clean and lively, with barbs of wit to keep things interesting. Cover of the routledge edition of purity and danger. A survey of this theory in architecture in the latetwentieth century reveals how it focused attention on relation. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo is a 1966 book by the anthropologist and cultural theorist mary douglas. The most surprising thing about reading mary douglass 1966 anthropological classic purity and danger. She sheds light on the symbolism of what is considered clean and dirty in relation to order in secular and religious, modern and primitive life.
Purity and danger this remarkable book, which is written in a very graceful, lucid and polemical style, is a symbolic interpretation of the rules of purity and pollution. Her basic argument is that a major problem that societies face is that many events are seen as ambiguous and anomalous and this material is hard to interpret. Mary douglas s seminal work purity and danger routledge, 1966 continues to be indispensable reading for both students and scholars today. Mary douglas shows that to examine what is considered as unclean in any culture is to take a lookingglass approach to the ordered patterning which that culture strives to. Marking the 50th anniversary of douglass classic, the present volume sheds fresh light upon themes raised by douglas by drawing on recent developments in the social sciences and humanities, as well as. Mary douglass seminal work purity and danger routledge, 1966 continues to be indispensable reading for both students and scholars today. In purity and danger mary douglas identifies the concern for purity as a key theme at the heart of every society. Pdf a very personal anthropology of mary douglas researchgate. Douglas work in the book is wideranging and touches on a number of different cultures and examples. Shoes on a table may be dirty, as douglas writes, but their presence on the table becomes really uncomfortable. Leonore davidoff on mary douglass purity and danger the reason why one voice speaks to another remains a mystery but my sense of the world was undoubtedly deeply effected by mary douglass purity and danger.
It is widely considered a classic in the field of cultural anthropology. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo 1966. Douglas arguments about purity and impurity in purity and danger can be seen as a move in a game to which we have forgotten the rules. In 1995 the book was included among the times literary supplements hundred most influential nonfiction works since wwii. It is a pleasure for me to reflect on the history of gridgroup. Douglas s own important teacher, evanspritchard, and her leading contemporary, edmund leach, are not mentioned in this particular chapter, but we do find the preeminent french anthropologist. What douglas does is to tie this distinction to the distinction between the scared. Jacob neusner, the idea of purity in ancient judaism studies in.
Purity and danger is an anthropological argument about how these concepts are created. Hanson blood and purity in leviticus and revelation. Pdf the paper presents an overview of the work of mary douglas. Purity and danger is an anthropological argument about how these concepts are created douglas work in the book is wideranging and touches on a number of different cultures and examples. In lively and lucid prose she explains its relevance for every reader by revealing its wideranging impact on our attitudes to society, values, cosmology and knowledge. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo by mary douglas. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo by mary douglas 1966 chapter 6 powers and dangers g ra ntedh iso pl. This is a theoretical work, written less for a lay audience than for douglass fellow cultural anthropologists, and yet her style is clean and lively, with.
An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo explores the cultural notion of dirt and its symbolic meanings. Purity and danger is acknowledged as a modern masterpiece of anthropology. Purity and danger, an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. While for many readers, her 1966 masterpiece, purity and danger, remains the last word for a theory of pollution, for douglas herself, the puzzles raised by purity rules have continued to drive her towards extending and modifying her original ideas. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo by mary douglas 1966 0630 hardcover 1626 4. It has gone through numerous reprints and reeditions 1969, 1970, 1978, 1984, 1991, 2002. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical. Douglas offers an approach to understanding rules of purity by examining what is considered unclean in various cultures. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo london. A survey of this theory in architecture in the latetwentieth century reveals how it focused attention on relationships between dirt, cleanliness, and the design and organisation of spacean area previously neglected in architectural. Theoretical problems from the perspective of religious studies v. May 04, 2017 purity and danger by mary douglas summary mary douglass purity and danger.
Purity and danger is a book written by british anthropologist mary douglas in 1966. Purity and dangeras evidence for architecture and urbanism this paper revisits mary douglas purity and danger. Download pdf marydouglasspurityanddanger free online. Research fellow, university college london introduction.
Purity and danger 1966 is an essay about the logic of pollution beliefs, suggesting that ideas about dirt and disorder outline and reinforce particular social orders. Mary douglas argues that all modern cultures have concepts of what is pure and impure, clean and taboo. According to douglas and wildavsky, environmentalism is caused by the rise of sectarianism, an outlook that emphasizes goodness, equality, and purity of heart and mind. I will offer some critical insights as well as a suggestion for another. I first described the idea in natural symbols douglas 1970, a kind of necessary sequel to purity and danger 1966. Marking the 50th anniversary of douglass classic, the present volume sheds fresh light upon. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo, was my sheer enjoyment of the thing. Pdf rethinking leviticus and rereading purity and danger. Mary douglas is an outstanding example of an evaluative thinker at work. Mary douglas s purity and danger download ebook pdf. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo by mary douglas 1966 chapter 6 powers and dangers g ranted that disorder spoils pattern. Since douglas 1966 wrote on purity and danger it has become clear that boundaries are very important to order, and indeed allimportant to the conception of social and cultural categories, of whichthe malefemale ones constitute one antithetical set.
Following my last post in which i was referencing few items that are helping me to write an essay about the landscapes of insurgencies, here is another one coming from another field of exploration but much closer to the topic that one might think at first sight. Douglas 19212007, a british anthropologist with an interest in comparative religion, pursues the idea that dirt. Marking the 50th anniversary of douglass classic, the present volume sheds fresh light upon themes raised by douglas by drawing on recent developments in the social sciences and humanities, as well as current empirical research. An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers 1982 hereinafter cited by page number only. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo 1966. Sectarianism in turn is a response to the problems of voluntary organization, the problems groups face trying to. Incorporating the philosophy of religion and science and a. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo by mary douglas 1966 into the. This paper revisits mary douglas purity and danger.
Purity and danger 1966 douglas book purity and danger first published 1966 is an analysis of the concepts of ritual purity and pollution in different societies and times to construct a general concept on how ritual purity is established, and is considered a key text in social anthropology. Douglas i arguments about purity and impurity in purity and danger can be seen as a move in a game to which we have forgotten the rules. A critical analysis of bielos purity, danger and redemption. Bielo uses the classical analysis of purity and danger by mary douglas 1966, i will examine how he manages this analysis. The strongest feelings of disgust arise in the unwelcome close presence of others.
93 859 277 784 812 1215 503 324 107 1103 118 1418 1423 167 665 224 269 302 1064 129 462 343 544 226 20 20 1364 422 685 31 1402 1456 469 434 1387 626 513 1389 118 606 18 1395 60 651